Between the Practical and the Problematic: ChatGPT in University Education for Business and Management Degrees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.v8n16.6349Keywords:
ChatGPT, Business Education, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Academic Ethics, Student PerceptionsAbstract
This study analyzes the effect of ChatGPT use on the perceptions, concerns, and perceived ethics of university students enrolled in business-related programs in academic setting. Using a cross-sectional quantitative approach, a structured questionnaire was administered to 118 business students at a Chilean University. The theoretical model was assessed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicated that ChatGPT use significantly influenced perceptions of its usefulness as an academic tool, explaining 61.3% of the variance in this construct. In contrast, no significant relationship was observed with students’ concerns, suggesting functional yet unreflective appropriation of the tool. Furthermore, the perceived ethics construct was excluded from the final model due to limitations in convergent validity. These findings reveal a dissociation between the instrumental valuation of the tool and ethical problematization of its use. The study concludes by highlighting the need to integrate institutional policies and pedagogical strategies that promote the critical, ethical, and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence in university education in management and business.
References
Alfirević, N., Praničević, D. G., & Mabić, M. (2024). Custom-Trained Large Language Models as Open Educational Resources: An Exploratory Research of a Business Management Educational Chatbot in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124929
Bhaskar, P., & Gupta, P. K. K. (2024). Delving into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education: a qualitative exploration. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2023-0169
Chin, W. (1998). “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling.” In GA Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. In MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems (Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 297–316). University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 5). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gao, Z., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., & Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. International Journal of Management Education, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958
Gupta, N., Shrivastava, A., Mathur, G., & Sachdeva, J. K. (2025). Impact of ChatGPT on the quantitative acumen of postgraduate business management students in central India. In Revista Gestão & Tecnologia (Journal of Management & Technology). Special Edition (Vol. 25, Issue 2). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-0529
Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
Jose, E. M. K., Prasanna, A., Kushwaha, B. P., & Das, M. (2024). Can generative AI motivate management students? The role of perceived value and information literacy. International Journal of Management Education, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101082
Kauppinen, A. (2024). Proactive Autonomous Assignments as Pedagogical Responses to the Rise of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Sport Management Teaching Practice. Sport Management Education Journal, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2023-0013
Malmström, H., Stöhr, C., & Ou, A. W. (2023). Chatbots and other AI for learning. https://doi.org/10.17196/cls.csclhe/2023/01
Mourtajji, L., & Arts-Chiss, N. (2024). Unleashing ChatGPT: Redefining Technology Acceptance and Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Administrative Sciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120325
Naamati-Schneider, L., & Alt, D. (2024). Beyond digital literacy: The era of AI-powered assistants and evolving user skills. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12694-z
Tran, T. M., Bakajic, M., & Pullman, M. (2024). Teacher’s pet or rebel? Practitioners’ perspectives on the impacts of ChatGPT on course design. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01350-7
Welding, L. (2023). Half of College Students Say Using AI Is Cheating | BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/college-students-ai-tools-survey/
Zou, Z. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Using Chatbots on Teacher-student Relationships in Today’s Higher Education. In Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences IMPES (Vol. 2024).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emerging Trends in Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
























