Social inequality from symbolic domination in public and private institutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.a5n9.5058

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges within the social sciences is to show the inequality that exists within educational organizations and institutions, which in this work will be analyzed from the interpretation of the microcosms (Habitus, Field, Capitals) of Pierre Bourdieu , which derive in a symbolic domination that is promoted in relation to the attached school to which the students belong, whether it is a public or private institution, as well as showing some of the elements that contribute to social inequality, through the mechanisms who collaborate in the reproduction of the same, derived from the capitals that individuals possess; The referential frameworks within the OS have left us a path in the conformation of the investigations within this field; Going back to Bourdieu in the study of organizations, not only implies carrying out the analysis of their categories, but also the understanding of these phenomena from a less functional sense, which focuses on the symbolic and the subjective, starting from the different rationalities of the OE, from a symbolic-interpretive approach, through the formation of capitals and in the conformation of field theory, to later show the reproduction of Bourdieu and Passeron.

Keywords: Symbolic domination; education; inequality; social capital; subjetivity

 

References

Bourdieu, P. (1987a). Los tres estados del capital cultural. Sociológica, 2 (5), 1-6. https://cutt.ly/GZbb6GM

Bourdieu, P. (1987b). Cosas Dichas. Editorial Gedisa.

Bourdieu, P. (1989). La nobleza de Estado. Editorial Grandes Ecoles y espíritu de cuerpo.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). Sociología y cultura. Grijalbo.

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Las estructuras sociales de la economía. Editorial Manantial.

Bourdieu, P & Passeron J. C. (1964) Les héritiers. Les Éditions de Minuit.

Dubet, F. (2015). ¿Por qué preferimos la desigualdad? (aunque digamos lo contrario). Siglo XXI.

Foucault, M. (1977). Historia de la sexualidad. Siglo XXI.

Foucault, M. (1979). El orden del discurso. Tusquets.

Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marke- ting, 31 (5/6), 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060636

Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Taurus.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI], (2020) Encuesta para la medición del impacto covid-19 en la educación (ecovid-ed). https://cutt.ly/MJ01F4S

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Free Press

Parsons, T. (1978). Culture and Social System Revisited. Social Science Quarterly, 53 (2), 253-266. https://cutt.ly/5ZRFLmD

Weber, M. (1993). Economía y Sociedad. Esbozo de una sociología comprensiva. Fondo de cultura económica.

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Herrera Martell, J., Herrera Caballero, J. M., & Martell Martínez, N. G. (2022). Social inequality from symbolic domination in public and private institutions. Emerging Trends in Education, 5(9), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.a5n9.5058